Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways
- Stablecoins and tokenized assets show blockchain’s practical value in global payments and finance.
- Web3 adoption hinges on connected, invisible networks delivering seamless experiences to millions.
The debate over which blockchain will dominate is finished. Bitcoin long ago established itself as the number one global store of value, and we’ve seen Ethereum cement its place as the primary settlement layer for digital finance.
Early blockchain development was shaped by rivalry. Each new network tried to outperform the others on speed, cost or decentralisation. It was a period that helped drive innovation but also distracted many in crypto from the real question: ‘How can these systems now serve people and businesses?’
Now it’s all about execution. These are pivotal moments for the industry, and we’re beginning to see blockchains move from theory to practical usage.
Crypto’s early years revolved around price and speculation. And they were needed — they served a purpose. Attention and hype brought in invaluable capital, but, unfortunately, also narrowed how people saw the technology. Mainstream investors and traditional finance watched the 2017 boom in ICOs, and it turned blockchain into a byword for wild speculation.
The industry has matured and is finding real-world uses for its products. The adoption of stablecoins alone is expected to generate an additional $1.4 trillion in demand for US dollars by 2027. It now begs the question of not whether blockchain works, but how it can scale to billions of users.
The rise of execution layers
Enter execution layers. They make transactions fast, reliable and affordable, bridging Ethereum’s security with the ease people expect from modern payment systems. Bitcoin and Ethereum have different but complementary roles. Bitcoin is the secure digital reserve, a hedge against inflation and policy risk, while Ethereum is the programmable base for settlement and trustless transactions.
Neither one of these two giants of crypto was built for speed. Their strength is security and finality. Growth now depends on the systems built on top of them. These networks make blockchain fast and reliable enough to match modern payment and banking systems.
The goal of an execution layer is to make blockchain invisible to users while keeping every transaction transparent. When payments clear instantly, and fees cost less than a cent, people stop thinking about the technology and just use it.
Stablecoins now move money across borders instantly and at almost no cost, but only when the networks beneath them can handle constant activity without slowing or breaking. The same principle applies to every form of digital value, from savings products to payments and onchain lending. Growth stalls before it reaches scale if it isn’t underpinned with dependable infrastructure.
Fintechs are starting to act on this. Stripe’s launch of stablecoin payments on Polygon shows that blockchain is becoming part of everyday finance and not a side experiment. The infrastructure is used to move tokenised assets, settle trades and connect new digital markets with traditional finance.
This results in a single, more fluid system where value can travel anywhere. Tokenised funds are already moving onchain. Franklin Templeton’s OnChain US Government Money Fund, built on Polygon, is proof that traditional assets can operate directly on public blockchain infrastructure.
The next challenge
A major challenge now is connection. Users, assets and activity remain scattered across different chains, limiting scale and liquidity. For Web3 to grow, these systems must work together as one network.
At Polygon, this is the problem we are addressing with Agglayer, a framework that links multiple blockchains so they can share value and security while keeping their independence. It lets developers expand to new users without rebuilding everything from the ground up.
When that connection happens, Web3 starts to look like a functioning economy rather than isolated silos. The importance of linked networks lies in the fact that it allows value to move freely.
Real adoption is strongest where the need is greatest. Across Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia, stablecoins are part of everyday life. Families in Argentina use them to protect savings from inflation amid an ongoing economic crisis. Freelancers in the Philippines receive wages in digital dollars.
Around the globe, there are real economies powered by blockchain systems that focus on speed and low cost. Once people can send money instantly without thinking about what enables it, adoption will become permanent.
Competition in Web3 has shifted from ideology to execution. The debates over consensus models or technical purity matter less than how well a network performs. The leaders will be those who offer a smooth, reliable experience and can handle millions of users without strain. When blockchain becomes simple and invisible, users stop discussing crypto.
The era of competing base layers has run its course. What matters now is how well execution networks turn that foundation into practical tools for people, businesses and governments.
The next wave of adoption will be led by those who make blockchain useful, not just possible. The builders who focus on making it invisible will define its most visible impact.
Key Takeaways
- Stablecoins and tokenized assets show blockchain’s practical value in global payments and finance.
- Web3 adoption hinges on connected, invisible networks delivering seamless experiences to millions.
The debate over which blockchain will dominate is finished. Bitcoin long ago established itself as the number one global store of value, and we’ve seen Ethereum cement its place as the primary settlement layer for digital finance.
Early blockchain development was shaped by rivalry. Each new network tried to outperform the others on speed, cost or decentralisation. It was a period that helped drive innovation but also distracted many in crypto from the real question: ‘How can these systems now serve people and businesses?’
