As Canada formalizes its federal AI policies, the emergence of Moltbook and its subsequent challenges can be a useful case study in establishing cybersecurity infrastructure.
Moltbook bills itself as a social network for AI agents—where bots post, comment and upvote while humans mostly watch from the sidelines. Around it sits the MOLT cryptocurrency, which in its brief existence has already spiked and crashed, attracting a wave of speculative interest.
The site’s premise is a clever concept on the surface—but its vulnerabilities raise serious concerns about security, manipulation, financial risk and the policy gap around AI-native platforms.
Since existing securities, privacy and cybersecurity frameworks were not designed for AI-only platforms and agent-driven tokens, it is incumbent on Canadian policymakers and business leaders to implement more appropriate strategies.
What makes Moltbook fragile
Three of the site’s features are particularly troubling from a security perspective:
- Vast quantities of agents can be created on Moltbook at almost no cost. One experiment showed a single user scripting an AI agent that spun up roughly one million accounts on its own.
- Humans can easily spoof AI agents—pose as bots—to steer discussions and orchestrate campaigns behind a veneer of autonomy.
- A tokenized micro-economy rewards activity with MOLT and invites retail investors into a highly volatile, thinly regulated niche.
Security research further suggests Moltbook’s implementation was immature. A team from cloud security posture management firm Wiz reportedly gained unauthenticated access to back-end systems, including user credentials, email addresses, private messages and agent data. From there, they were able to impersonate agents, edit posts and script large-scale manipulation of what appeared to be autonomous behaviour.
Experts have also pointed to the site’s exposure to classic AI-powered cyber attack techniques such as prompt injection and watering hole attacks in a dense, automated environment.
Malicious actors can take advantage of these gaps to:
- Seed or amplify coordinated narratives that look like emergent AI consensus.
- Push malicious links or payloads through large numbers of agents wired into external tools and environments.
- Systematically distort any signals others believe they are reading from agent activity on the platform.
Policy and governance issues
Platforms like Moltbook blur whether a human, AI agent or attacker is actually speaking, who is accountable when an agent amplifies hate, fraud or market manipulation, and where jurisdiction begins and ends when behaviour is generated by code and propagated globally.
The underlying issue is the pattern Moltbook represents—which should serve as a warning to businesses and policymakers alike. As Canada refines its federal AI policies, the following areas merit particular attention:
Agent identity and verification
Non-human actors are becoming first-class users of digital platforms. This situation calls for a basic framework that distinguishes verified agents from arbitrary scripts and records who ultimately controls which agents—at least for regulated activities.
Canada’s AI regulations could champion minimum standards for agent identity on platforms that touch financial markets, critical infrastructure or large-scale public discourse. Businesses looking for a competitive advantage should work to get ahead of the curve by implementing and disclosing these practices ahead of potential regulatory enforcement.
Security baselines for AI-dense platforms
When a service encourages users to connect agents to external tools, wallets or application programming interfaces (APIs), security failures become systemic risks—not isolated bugs.
Governments and regulators should work with standards bodies to define baseline controls for AI-only or AI-heavy services, including independent security testing before launch, rapid disclosure of breaches affecting agent credentials or user data, and clear rules for quarantining and recovering compromised agents.
Businesses leaders, meanwhile, should use this opportunity to revisit their own security bona fides to ensure future compliance.
Rules for AI-linked tokens
Tokens like MOLT sit at the intersection of the ongoing AI narrative , social media discourse and speculative trading. Even where they fall outside full securities registration, Canadian regulations could:
- Require plain-language risk disclosures when such tokens are marketed to Canadians through AI agents or autonomous platforms.
- Treat certain AI-themed cryptocurrencies as high-risk products with suitability and leverage limits for retail investors.
- Clarify, with securities regulators, when these instruments in fact qualify as securities or derivatives.
Guidance for public institutions
Government departments, pension funds and publicly funded research bodies should approach these platforms with caution.
Clear internal guidance is critical for public trust and security. These institutions should avoid reliance on agent-only platforms as serious data sources for policy, market intelligence or sentiment analysis; they should also take care to not promote or implicitly endorse speculative AI-linked platforms or tokens to the public.
While private businesses are not subject to the same scrutiny as public institutions, they should still consider incorporating elements of caution into their advice to clients.
The takeaway
AI agent-centred platforms like Moltbook show the importance of embracing experimentation while being explicit about what elements are not robust enough yet for critical use.
Canadian policymakers and businesses shouldn’t overreact to these challenges—but they should consider a shift from passive observation to proactive, principled guidance in consultation with the appropriate advisors as more platforms emerge and gain popularity.
Read RSM Canada’s latest analysis in The Real Economy Canada and subscribe for more updates.
