WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s proposal to put a coat of white paint on the exterior of a 19th-century historic landmark building next to the White House could cost at least $7.5 million, a White House official involved in the project said Thursday.
Ryan Erb, the construction operations and facilities manager in the White House Office of Administration, which is spearheading the proposal, discussed details with members of the National Capital Planning Commission as the federal agency opened its review process.
The commission did not approve the project on Thursday, instead directing the White House to provide additional information to the agency at a future date.
The proposed painting of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building is one piece of a broader plan the Republican president has said will make Washington more beautiful.
Trump is making numerous changes inside and outside the White House and its grounds, most notably razing the East Wing to build a 1,000-person ballroom. Across the street from the mansion, Lafayette Park is closed for renovations, including restoring the fountains.
“President Trump continues to beautify the White House and our Nation’s Capital and is giving it the glory it deserves – something everyone should celebrate,” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said in an emailed statement after the meeting.
Questioned about project costs, Erb said his office continues to work with an outside vendor to test the silicate paint they want to use, but offered $7.5 million as a preliminary estimate for the exterior paint job alone. The figure does not include costs for maintaining the paint.
“Unfortunately, we can’t rush that process,” Erb told the commissioners at their monthly meeting. “We’re trying to get all the data first.”
The White House has put forward two proposals: painting the entire gray granite exterior of the Eisenhower building white, or painting most of the building white while leaving the granite base as is. Painting the entire building is preferred, officials have said.
Trump last year said the gray is a “really bad color.”
Erb said Thursday that the paint is being tested on granite samples from a quarry in Maine because no testing can be done on the Eisenhower building itself. He stressed that the samples are new stone and not aged like what is on the building, which opened in 1888 after 17 years of construction.
“The initial data was encouraging for this process,” he said.
But the proposal has alarmed preservationists, architects, historians and others who argue that granite is not meant to be painted and that paint would trap moisture and deteriorate the stone.
“Painting the granite facade of the building white will adversely and permanently alter this important landmark, and should be rejected,” said Priya Jain, of the Society of Architectural Historians. She was among 11 people who commented at Thursday’s meeting. Most urged the commission to reject the proposal.
More than 2,000 public comments submitted to the agency and available on its website were also strongly opposed to the plan. Commenters criticized the expected cost as a waste of taxpayer dollars and argued that a white Eisenhower building would throw off the visual balance along that portion of Pennsylvania Avenue and overwhelm the White House. Some suggested improved landscaping, lighting and other steps to improve the building’s appearance.
The capital planning commission, chaired by top Trump White House aide Will Scharf, approved staff comments on the proposal. That means White House officials will have to present additional information to the agency on a future date, including details about the type of paint to be used as well as alternatives that could improve the building’s appearance without painting it.
A separate federal agency – the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts – is also reviewing the proposal and recently asked the White House to present additional information, including about paint testing, before a vote to approve it.
The Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which sits across a driveway from the White House, is a National Historic Landmark. It is also listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
A lawsuit against the proposed paint job is working its way through federal court.
