In the mid‑20th century, when humanity discovered it had the ability to wipe itself out, Albert Einstein and Robert Oppenheimer imagined a symbolic clock measuring how close we were to disaster. But the threat was never limited to the nuclear realm. A recently published paper shows as much. Resource depletion, institutional fragility, and potential technological crises have all served as key variables for a group of researchers trying to determine how long a civilization can remain active before collapsing. In that effort, the authors sketched out 10 possible futures a thousand years from now.
The work was led by astrobiologist Celia Blanco, a researcher at Spain’s Center for Astrobiology (CSIC-INTA) and the Blue Marble Space Institute of Science in Seattle, Washington. It seeks to explore how different combinations of resource consumption and governance can lead to stable societies, recurring collapses, or long cycles of rebuilding. “The model is not intended to explore the consequences of each configuration,” Blanco notes. The study’s scenarios function more as variations to answer one question: what kind of civilization manages to survive?
In some futures, humanity falls into near-permanent spirals of crisis. In others, it manages to stabilize for centuries. But stable situations are the minority. “Stable utopias are probably the least plausible scenarios,” Blanco says. “Not because they’re impossible, but because they require conditions we do not see on present-day Earth: genuine post-scarcity, distributed global governance, and the absence of existential risks,” the researcher explains.
The optimistic scenarios, identified in the article as “Golden Age” and “Out of Eden,” describe civilizations capable of sustaining growth and stability without collapses that wipe everything out. At the opposite end are models such as “Big Brother is Watching” and “Sword of Damocles,” where concentrated power, political fragility, or exposure to extreme risks trigger repeated breakdowns.
A galaxy of extinct civilizations
The study also tries to answer why we have not picked up signals from other intelligences in the universe. According to the model, many civilizations may spend most of their existence in inactive states — alternating periods of activity with centuries of silence. That, the authors argue, would drastically reduce the chances of detecting signals from elsewhere in the galaxy.
“The main lesson is that the silence we observe does not necessarily mean we are alone,” Blanco says. “It could simply reflect that most civilizations are off for most of the time.”
Deterioration is gradual
One of the central points of Blanco’s work, together with astrobiologists George Profitiliotis and Jacob Haqq-Misra, is that civilizations do not need a single great catastrophe — like a comet, a dinosaur‑killing asteroid, global pandemics, or other extreme events — to collapse. It is enough, they argue, to consume resources faster than they regenerate. “It is probably what should worry us most,” the Spanish researcher warns. “It is the lever that moves the needle in almost all scenarios. Civilizations that do not control their consumption end up collapsing even without wars or global disasters.”
The scientist uses an image to sum this up: a house with a leak in the roof. The problem is seldom the first rainy day, but rather ignoring a gradual deterioration for too long until the structure can no longer hold and collapses into rubble.
Another variable the authors have identified is resilience. How much knowledge is preserved, how much infrastructure survives. and how long a society takes to reorganize after a crisis will determine its survival. “A society that falls but rises quickly can persist indefinitely. By contrast, one that suffers a smaller collapse but loses the capacity to rebuild can disappear,” she explains. “The civilizations that persist are those that know how to get back up.”
The researchers describe a world subject to periodic cycles of destruction and rebirth. But they also outline scenarios where the future depends largely on human decisions. “A civilization’s fate is more a matter of planning and design than of luck,” says Blanco. “The decisions made now about infrastructure, resource management, and the preservation of knowledge will determine which scenario we end up in.”
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
