Today, patients are responsible for more of their healthcare costs than they used to be. As employers continue to pass along higher premiums and deductibles, leaving families responsible for a larger share of their care, the payment experience has become part of how patients evaluate the overall care experience.
Patient expectations around healthcare payments have shifted in measurable ways. Patients want the speed and simplicity of digital options, and expect statements to include a clear path to pay online. These expectations are shaped by how consumers pay everywhere else – where saved credentials, digital wallets and streamlined or even automated checkout flows are standard. But healthcare operates differently. Patients often don’t have a choice about receiving or paying for care, which means providers may not feel the same pressure to expand payment options or simplify checkout. Modernizing payment workflows can shorten accounts receivable timelines, but that operational benefit doesn’t always translate into urgency around the patient-facing experience.
As a consequence, friction in healthcare doesn’t typically show up as abandonment. It shows up in the form of delayed payments as patients hold on making payments or question why a card is accepted in one setting but declined in another. This confusion extends payment timelines and adds to the administrative burden.
Why payment friction in healthcare looks different
Payment delays are harder to measure than abandonment, which is part of why payment friction in healthcare goes unaddressed for as long as it does. In retail, customers have the choice to purchase. In healthcare, patients are usually deciding not if they will pay, but when and how they can.
Because of that, the telltale signs that make payment breakdowns in retail visible, like cart abandonment rates and conversion drop-offs, don’t have clean equivalents in healthcare. Patients can’t walk away from a bill the way a shopper walks away from a checkout page.
Billing confusion is one of the most common instances of friction in healthcare, and nearly half of consumers reported some form of trouble when paying for their most recent care. Patients delay payments when insurance adjustments, deductibles, or line-item charges are unclear.
Outdated or fragmented payment systems can worsen this problem. When payments aren’t posted on time or are not immediately visible to patients, it creates uncertainty about whether a bill has already been paid or what balance remains. This lack of visibility can create confusion and extend the payment cycle.
Inconsistent payments are another common form of healthcare payment friction. A patient’s card that works at a hospital billing portal but gets declined at a pharmacy counter creates confusion. Patients assume that they entered the wrong information or their benefits changed, even when the issue comes from backend configuration differences. This can be made worse with complicated security verification steps. While safeguards are critical, overly complicated or misconfigured setups can interrupt completion. These requirements can end up extending the payment cycle as patients leave and return later.
Unlike retail payment abandonment, these breakdowns may seem more incremental. However, when compounded across thousands of transactions, they can slow down revenue cycles, increase administrative workload, and diminish long-term patient loyalty.
The payment blind spot in pharma
While there are several friction points within healthcare payments, the gap between how hospitals and pharmacies handle specialty card acceptance is one that doesn’t get discussed enough.
To patients, there’s little difference between hospitals, clinics, or pharmacies when it comes to payment acceptance. But behind the scenes, those differences are critical. For example, take the acceptance of FSA, HSA, and certain Medicare-related cards. Hospitals are usually automatically included in programs that allow them to accept specialty card types while pharmacies and other providers may need to register separately and ensure they are set up correctly with their processor and software integration. If that setup isn’t handled properly, transactions will decline.
From a patient’s perspective, this causes confusion: Why does my card work at the clinic but not at the pharmacy? Why was it accepted last month but declined today? The answer is buried in processor configurations and network rules that patients have no visibility into.
That inconsistency causes frustration and can diminish trust, even when the issue stems from backend setup over policy. While these backend decisions rarely receive attention outside of payments teams, when not managed properly, they directly affect billing timelines, support call volume, and the overall patient experience.
Looking ahead: What healthcare leaders should prioritize
As patient payment responsibility grows and becomes a larger part of the overall care experience, payment decisions need more visibility across the organization, not just in finance or IT.
Healthcare organizations should begin with a practical review that includes: which payment methods are accepted at every point of care, whether FSA, HSA, and Medicare card configurations are validated across systems, where declines are occurring and why, and how long it takes patients to move from statement to payment.
Payment friction isn’t always obvious. It shows up in extended accounts receivable timelines, increased billing inquiries, and patients who delay payment – not because they’re unwilling to pay, but because the process made it harder than it needed to be. As patients become responsible for more of the bill, consistency matters. The payment process should be predictable across settings and straightforward to navigate.
Payment systems may not determine whether care is delivered. But as more financial responsibility shifts to patients, they increasingly influence how that care is experienced.
Photo: Viorika, Getty Images
Stephanie O’Connor is the Director of Operations and Merchant Experience at Wind River Payments, where she leads a team of relationship managers who work directly with clients to help them navigate the complexities of modern payments – from transaction processing to fraud prevention and customer experience. She brings more than a decade of financial services industry experience working closely with merchants and payment partners.
This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.
