All writing is autobiographical. Even if you’re not explicitly writing about your own experience, it shows up in the topics you choose, the details you focus on, even the things you leave out.
Key example from my trove of nearly 3,000 articles here on Inc. over the years: a study I latched onto a decade ago about the single thing wealthy families do to give their kids a leg up on the world.
The answer, drawn from University of Southern California research, was straightforward: They buy the neighborhood.
The insight wasn’t so much about money as it was about what money makes possible. Stable schools, stable peer groups, and stable environments. The specific advice for parents who couldn’t afford the nicest neighborhood was to buy the smallest house in the best one they could.
I cared about this because I had just become a parent for the first time, and I was on a tear to find as much research-based advice as possible about how not to mess up my child’s life.
Later, when my wife and I were ready to leave our city apartment, that article was genuinely part of the conversation. We ended up with one of the smaller houses in a fairly affluent town. So far it has felt like a good decision. Knock on wood, I don’t think I’ve done a terrible job as a parent.
Still, I pay close attention to parenting advice that makes sense. The latest find: Harvard researchers recently published something that reframes the idea from a decade ago and makes it considerably more powerful.
A web of stability
The paper, released in March by Harvard’s Early Childhood Scientific Council on Equity and the Environment, is titled From Resources to Routines: The Importance of Stability in the Developmental Environment.
It synthesizes a wide body of research on what children need to develop healthy brains and bodies, and its central finding is that stability is important, but it’s not just one thing. It’s more of a web.
Housing, finances, caregiver relationships, sleep routines, daily schedules—they aren’t separate variables so much as interconnected threads. When one frays, others tend to follow.
An unexpected drop in family income, for example, often leads to loss of housing, which disrupts routines, which affects sleep, which impairs learning, which compounds everything else.
The multiplier effect
The paper calls this the multiplier effect, and it runs in both directions. Strengthen stability in one area, and it tends to support stability in others.
While the 2016 study was fundamentally about resources—what wealthy parents can buy—the Harvard paper is about something more fundamental: what the brain needs in order to develop properly, and why instability at the wrong moment is so costly.
Beginning before birth, children’s brains develop in response to patterns in their environment.
Consistent, predictable interactions with caregivers—what the researchers call “serve and return” exchanges—build the neural circuits that support language, emotional regulation, and learning.
When those patterns are disrupted repeatedly, it triggers a stress response that is protective in the short term but harmful if it persists: hormones, inflammation, and ultimately an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, anxiety, and depression.
The paper also makes a point that surprised me: Instability can accelerate puberty.
When young children perceive their environment as harsh and unpredictable, the resulting stress can trigger earlier pubertal development, which carries its own downstream health risks.
Unpredictability and resilience
The most useful reframe in the paper is the distinction between stability and novelty. It’s not that children need a perfectly static world. Novel experiences are essential for learning and curiosity.
A child conquering a higher slide, a family moving to a better school district, a parent leaving a bad situation—these disruptions can ultimately be beneficial, if a foundation of consistent adult support is in place.
Some unpredictability builds resilience. However, chronic unpredictability, especially when it comes from things families can’t control—unstable work schedules, housing insecurity, and climate-driven displacement—is what does the damage.
The thread from 2016
Ten years ago, the takeaway was essentially that if you can afford stability, buy it. The Harvard paper suggests the stakes are even higher than that, and the mechanisms are clearer.
Developing brains are literally built or disrupted by the patterns of predictability they encounter in their earliest years.
For parents who can’t buy the neighborhood, the paper’s most actionable message is about what’s still within reach: the routines.
Consistent mealtimes, predictable bedtimes, and reliable responses to a child’s needs aren’t consolation prizes.
According to the research, they’re the mechanism—the way stability actually works at the level of developing neurology.
The multiplier runs through whatever thread you can actually hold.
—Bill Murphy Jr., Founder of Understandably and Contributing Editor
This article originally appeared on Fast Company’s sister website, Inc.com.
Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy.
