Starting this Monday, April 20, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in Florida is entering a new phase with the implementation of rules aimed at changing the shopping habits of its beneficiaries. The state has restricted the use of these funds for the purchase of soft drinks, candy, and ultra-processed desserts, focusing resources on options with greater nutritional value — a move that may sound positive but could also pose a problem due to the higher costs of healthier foods.
What are the changes to SNAP?
SNAP recipients in Florida will no longer be able to purchase soft drinks, energy drinks, candy, or ultra-processed, long-shelf-life desserts. Well-known brands such as Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Monster, and Red Bull, as well as candies from Hershey’s and Skittles, have been excluded from the program. Even mass-market products like Twinkies and Oreo cookies are now off-limits for those who rely on this assistance.
However, the regulations allow for certain gray areas that, in theory, aim to promote less harmful alternatives. Sports drinks like Gatorade, sparkling mineral water, and juices containing more than 50% fruit or that are low in sugar remain eligible products. In fact, items such as granola bars, Pop-Tarts, and freshly baked bread from supermarket bakeries will still be allowed, which has raised questions about the nutritional consistency of the list.
Health as a political issue
This transformation in Florida is spearheading the federal “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) initiative, a movement led by Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. that aims to reverse decades of diet-related chronic diseases.
Florida thus becomes one of 22 states that, with Washington’s approval, are seeking to “align SNAP with its original purpose.” For supporters of the law, taxpayer money should not incentivize the consumption of sugars that lead to issues that overwhelm the healthcare system.
Criticism
For advocacy groups, the measure amounts to “micromanaging” poverty and does not address the underlying problem: the cost of healthy food. Joel Berg, CEO of Hunger Free America, told Fox 13 that the ban punishes people for a lack of affordable options: “It’s not that low-income Americans don’t want healthier food; it’s that they can’t afford healthier food. We should make America healthier again by making healthy food more affordable, convenient, and physically available. We shouldn’t micromanage the eating patterns of adults to try to achieve that goal.”
Cindy Huddleston, an analyst at the Florida Policy Institute, told WLRN about the change: “It blames participants for something that’s not within their control, which is having adequate benefits to be able to buy healthy food for every meal, and that needs to be a benefit increase, not looking at ways to make it harder for people to shop.”
The next cut: From SNAP to the WIC program
The pressure on families is intensifying with the parallel announcement of cuts to other pillars of social assistance. While SNAP restricts processed foods, the government has proposed drastically reducing the budget for fruits and vegetables in the WIC program, which serves mothers and children. According to data from Hunger Free America, these cuts could remove $1.4 billion in fresh produce benefits from more than five million people.
This double pressure — restrictions on one hand and the rising cost of healthy food on the other — puts local food banks in a critical situation. Lorena Hardwick of Feeding Tampa Bay told WUSF that for many, the reality will be the loss of small daily pleasures without a real alternative on the table.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
